Dual Sim, 3G, 4G, VoLTE, Wi-Fi; Helio P60, Octa Core, 1.99 GHz Processor; 4 GB RAM, 64 GB inbuilt; 4150 mAh Battery; 6.3 inches, 1080 x 2340 px Display with Water Drop Notch. AnTuTu benchmark is the most popular benchmarking app in the world! Over 200,000,000 users choice AnTuTu. AnTuTu also support cross-platform，including Android, iOS and Windows. AnTuTu is one of the most popular Benchmarking platforms and talking about the benchmark scores, the Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 processor inside the Redmi Note 5 Pro scored 113K. Coming to the Helio P60 chipset, the Realme 1 (powered by the Helio P60) scores 138K on AnTuTu which means Helio P60 scores higher when compared to the Snapdragon 636. POPTEL P60 Antutu benchmark score. In the AnTuTu benchmark test, the POPTEL P60 got a score of 82511 points. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below. The MediaTek Helio P60 consistently outperforms competitors in performance benchmarks such as Antutu, while also operating at a close to equivalent temperature. This is thanks to its intelligent CorePilot control and advanced 12nm fabrication.
|
|
| ChipGuider.com - All about any processors and chips: desktop CPU, mobile SoC, GPU. 2021(c) |
VS
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (with Adreno 610 graphics) and Mediatek Helio P60 (Mali-G72 MP3). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
Single and multi-core processor tests
29
25
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
15
12
Efficiency of battery consumption
67
49
Overall chip score
35
29
Main differences and advantages of each chip
- Performs 3.2x better in floating-point computations
- Developers optimize games for Snapdragon processors more often than for Helio
- Announced 1-year and 11-months later
- Has a smaller size transistor (11 versus 12 nm)
- Shows better (up to 5%) AnTuTu 8 score – 180K vs 171K
Pros of Mediatek Helio P60
- Higher GPU frequency (~33%)
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksThe AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
180239
171210
| CPU | 69810 | 68803 |
| GPU | 34159 | 23779 |
| Memory | 44417 | 24831 |
| UX | 33716 | 32378 |
| Total score | 180239 | 171210 |
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
314
276
1397
1129
| Image compression | 90.6 Mpixels/s | 77.3 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | 13.25 images/s | 11.2 images/s |
| Speech recognition | 23.7 words/s | 17.1 words/s |
| Machine learning | 17.85 images/s | 12.3 images/s |
| Camera shooting | 11.8 images/s | 9.55 images/s |
| HTML 5 | 1.9 Mnodes/s | 1.57 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | 505.85 Krows/s | 419.5 Krows/s |
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
| PUBG Mobile | 28 FPS [Low] | - |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 30 FPS [Ultra] | - |
| Fortnite | 26 FPS [Low] | - |
| Shadowgun Legends | 54 FPS [Low] | - |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 59 FPS [Medium] | - |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 30 FPS [High] | - |
| Device | Xiaomi Poco M3 1080 x 2340 | - |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 662 and Helio P60| Architecture | 4x 2 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73) 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53) | 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| Process | 11 nanometers | 12 nanometers |
| TDP | 9 W | 5 W |
| GPU name | Adreno 610 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 3 |
| Shading units | 96 | 48 |
| FLOPS | 272 Gigaflops | 86 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 32 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 13.91 Gbit/s | - |
| Max size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 683 | No |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2340 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 32MP, 2x 24MP |
| Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
| Modem | X11 | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 13 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 390 Mbps | Up to 300 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 Mbps | Up to 150 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
| Announced | January 2020 | February 2018 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Model number | SM615 | MT6771 |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 official site | Mediatek Helio P60 official site |
So, which SoC would you choose?
119 (63.6%)
Mt6771 Helio P60 Antutu
68 (36.4%)
Total votes: 187
2.Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Snapdragon 662
4.MediaTek Helio G80 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Helio P60 Antutu
6.Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Mediatek Helio P60
8.MediaTek Helio G80 vs Mediatek Helio P60
Helio P60 Antutu
10.HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Mediatek Helio P60